Institutional fit
The relationship should add a capability that is relevant to GIGT's mandate base — banking, investment, legal, technical, logistics, compliance, project execution or another defined professional function.
Relationships
Institutional relationships that support execution.
GIGT GROUP develops strategic relationships with financial institutions, advisers, commercial partners, service providers and international counterparties.
Featured institutional relationship
ICBANKSG / ICBANKUS
GIGT GROUP serves as the exclusive authorized agency and strategic consulting channel for designated ICBANKSG / ICBANKUS international programs.
View partnership details ->Agent Code
ICBAUTHGIGT2026001SGExclusive Global Agency & Strategic ConsultingPartner references: Additional company and counterparty logos should only be published after the relationship and logo-use permission are confirmed. This build intentionally avoids presenting unverified companies as active partners.
Relationship philosophy
Strong transactions are built through a network of institutions and specialists who understand their role.
GIGT GROUP's relationship model is designed around collaboration rather than dependency on a single channel. Depending on the mandate, a transaction may require banks, investors, project sponsors, contractors, legal advisers, accountants, logistics providers, insurers, technical consultants or other specialists.
We seek relationships that improve execution quality, document integrity and access to credible decision-makers. We do not publish an institution's logo or imply endorsement without appropriate basis and approval.
How we evaluate relationships
Reputation matters, but execution capability matters more.
We value counterparties that communicate clearly, understand their regulatory and contractual responsibilities, maintain dependable documentation and can execute within the timetable they represent.
Professional accountability
Partners should be prepared to stand behind their own instructions, documents and responsibilities rather than shifting material decisions through informal intermediaries.
Long-term value
We prefer relationships that can support repeatable institutional work and mutual credibility over one-off introductions with unclear responsibilities.