Who are the parties?
Applicant, shareholders, UBOs, authorized signatories, beneficiary, contractor, seller, project owner and any intermediary roles should be clearly identified.
How We Work
Institutional execution is a process.
GIGT applies a structured mandate lifecycle designed to improve clarity, document readiness, transaction control and communication from first review through completion.
01 — Mandate Intake
Define the requirement
Applicant identity, transaction purpose, amount, currency, project or contract, counterparties and timeline.
02 — Preliminary Review
Test fit and readiness
Assess the applicable service or program, basic eligibility, missing information and likely execution path.
03 — Document Readiness
Build the file
Organize KYC, corporate documents, project materials, contracts, feasibility information and supporting evidence.
04 — Structuring
Align mechanics
Define facility, instrument, fees, security, repayment, milestones and responsibilities appropriate to the mandate.
05 — Institutional Review
Compliance & approval
Submit through the appropriate institutional channel for independent compliance, risk and approval decisions.
06 — Formal Documentation
Confirm terms
Review agreements, approval letters, drafts, invoices, instructions and conditions precedent.
07 — Execution
Implement the approved path
Coordinate approved issuance, funding, disbursement, escrow, settlement or related transaction actions.
08 — Follow-Up & Close
Maintain the record
Track status, outstanding conditions, confirmations, return obligations and transaction closure.
What improves execution
Good mandates are easier to evaluate.
Incomplete files create delay, ambiguity and avoidable compliance risk. A well-prepared mandate connects the commercial purpose to the legal entities, financial requirement, underlying contract or project, repayment logic and supporting documents.
- Clear applicant and beneficial ownership information
- Defined funding or instrument requirement
- Commercial rationale and use of funds
- Project or trade documentation
- Realistic timeline and counterparties
- Evidence supporting source and movement of funds
What this process does not mean
A structured application, document checklist, consultation, draft, fee quotation or submission does not by itself constitute financing approval, issuance or a bank commitment. Formal decisions remain with the relevant institution.
Mandate readiness standard
What we want to know before we represent a transaction.
Strong mandates answer the difficult questions early. The following elements materially improve the quality of institutional review.
What is the commercial purpose?
The transaction should be connected to a real project, contract, shipment, acquisition, expansion plan or other identifiable commercial objective.
What evidence exists?
Corporate documents, KYC, contracts, feasibility, invoices, project plans, delivery terms and financial information should support the narrative presented.
How will it execute?
Amounts, currency, timing, repayment source, security, payment instructions, disbursement conditions and responsible institutions should be understood before execution begins.
What could stop it?
Compliance issues, incomplete documentation, unrealistic pricing, unclear source of funds, counterparty gaps or inconsistent contracts should be addressed rather than hidden.
What decision is required?
Every submission should make it clear what the institution is being asked to approve, issue, finance, hold, release or confirm.